When the New York Times food pages ran an article (4/08/15) on the family recipes from poet Tracy K. Smith, it included one for pound cake and another for Alabama Lemon Cheese Cake. I was drawn to the pound cake recipe immediately because it sounded so good and I love pound cake.  The recipe was written with the Times‘ relatively new practice of giving both metric and traditional cup measures. I  made the cake  using the gram measurements.

The cake turned out to be one of the best versions of pound cake.  It was extremely buttery, dense and rich, improving in flavor the more it stayed in a covered cake dome on the counter. I published my version here last year, giving the ingredients in weight  as well as the cup measures.

My original pound cake adaptation using gram measurements

I made the cake many times since. Then I finally noticed a disparity in the Times’ calculation of equivalent measures of cups and grams.  Both the flour and sugar gram/cup equivalents were way wrong.

One cup of flour is 120 grams.  The recipe called for 3 cups cake flour measured after sifting.  The gram measurement listed in the recipe was  270 grams. Wrong. It should have been 360 grams (120 g x 3).  I wrote to the Times about the mistake and their remedy was to remove the gram measurements entirely rather than to offer a version with correct  weight in grams. So I wondered, which one was correct? Didn’t they want to retest the recipe?  Most likely an old family recipe from an American kitchen would not have been written in metrics.  Someone at the Times test kitchen (do they still have one?)  clearly miscalculated.

As for the sugar that too had a mistake.  Three cups of sugar equals 600 grams (200 grams per cup).  The Times recipe called for 540 grams, which is about 2 2/3  to 2  3/4 cups instead of three.

I’ve made this cake probably ten times using the gram measurements.  And I’m forever grateful to discover the Times blooper that resulted in a great pound cake

Finally, just last week I decided to make the cake using the Times recipe with  cup weights.  When I’ve made the cake using gram measurements, I put the batter into a 9-inch Bundt pan. This time I put it into a 10-inch tube pan because it was a bigger batter with more flour and sugar.  The batter was a tad shy in filling up the 10-inch pan and would have been too much for a 9-inch pan.

The cake came out just fine, though it wasn’t as spectacular as the gram-weight version.  That one was very buttery, nearly wet with butter  because of less flour and sugar.  The baking time was a little tricky, though, varying each time I made it. Refer to the original post, Pound for Pound to see how it was written.  See link to view the recipe  that now stands in the Times archive pages.  Interestingly there was another recipe in the article for Alabama Lemon Cheese Cake.  That one, written with cups and grams, retains all the mistakes that the pound  cake originally had.

My suggestion is to make the gram version.  I’ve given that recipe below showing the corrected equivalent cup  and gram measures.Try both versions and see what you think. The original cup version is classic and the gram version is spectacular.